W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Issues with backwards compatibility

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:49:33 +0200
Message-ID: <539A206D.7040408@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: public-ontolex@w3.org
John, all,

    a few things. I am in favour of introducing the class 
"MultiWordUnit" as a subclass of LexicalEntry, fair enough.

Concerning the properties "context", "condition" and "incompatibility".

"context" and "condition" are useful, clearly. But then the property 
"confidence" of a Translation should also be there. I see the three 
equally useful and equaly vague semantically as they could have anyhting 
as a range.

Concerning "incompatibility": not sure, this seems like one of many 
possible properties that could be defined between senses, so it seems 
quite arbitraty to pick this one out.

Just my two cents,


Am 06.06.14 17:25, schrieb John P. McCrae:
> Hi all,
> Due to the large number of resources using the previous Monnet /lemon 
> /vocabulary it seems natural that we should support users who wish to 
> transition to the W3C OntoLex /lemon /vocabulary. As such I was 
> looking into the conversion.
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Monnet_OntoLex_Compatibility
> There are some areas where the previous model has significant 
> differences that we should consider whether to adopt. (Of course I do 
> not assume that everything in Monnet Lemon should be transferred 
> across but we should attempt to be able to represent relevant use 
> cases already addressed by Monnet Lemon).
> From my analysis, there are two main issues that we should still address
>   * Monnet /lemon/ has more sophisticated description of senses, in
>     particular, mechanisms such as contexts
>     <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node11.html>, conditions
>     <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node30.html>, definitions,
>     examples and incompatibility
>     <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node14.html>
>   * Monnet /lemon/ allows us to say if a lexical entry is a multi-word
>     expression, affix or word.
> Any comments on whether we should allow this modelling
> Regards,
> John


Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
Raum 2.307
Universit├Ąt Bielefeld
Inspiration 1
33619 Bielefeld
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 21:50:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:40 UTC