W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Issues with backwards compatibility

From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:44:45 +0100
Message-ID: <5399A0BD.6060603@cs.tcd.ie>
To: public-ontolex@w3.org
If we wish to address use cases involving terminology management then 
support for multiword expressions is important as these are very common 
in term bases.

Regards,
Dave

On 06/06/2014 16:44, Paul Buitelaar wrote:
> thanks for the infos John
>
> on: Monnet /lemon/ allows us to say if a lexical entry is a multi-word 
> expression, affix or word.
>
> there are strong use cases for MWEs, e.g. in the way we use lemon in 
> EuroSentiment for the definition of complex sentiment expressions such 
> as 'quite good', 'bit dirty'
>
> not sure on affixes
>
> word is obvious
>
> cheers
>
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 06/06/2014 16:25, John P. McCrae wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Due to the large number of resources using the previous Monnet /lemon
>> /vocabulary it seems natural that we should support users who wish to
>> transition to the W3C OntoLex /lemon /vocabulary. As such I was looking
>> into the conversion.
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Monnet_OntoLex_Compatibility
>>
>> There are some areas where the previous model has significant
>> differences that we should consider whether to adopt. (Of course I do
>> not assume that everything in Monnet Lemon should be transferred across
>> but we should attempt to be able to represent relevant use cases already
>> addressed by Monnet Lemon).
>>
>>  From my analysis, there are two main issues that we should still 
>> address
>>
>>   * Monnet /lemon/ has more sophisticated description of senses, in
>>     particular, mechanisms such as contexts
>>     <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node11.html>, conditions
>>     <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node30.html>, definitions,
>>     examples and incompatibility
>>     <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node14.html>
>>   * Monnet /lemon/ allows us to say if a lexical entry is a multi-word
>>     expression, affix or word.
>>
>> Any comments on whether we should allow this modelling
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>
>
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 12:40:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:40 UTC