- From: Francis Bond <bond@ieee.org>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:35:46 +0800
- To: Paul Buitelaar <paul.buitelaar@deri.org>
- Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>, Gabi Vulcu <Gabriela.Vulcu@deri.org>
G'day, > not sure on affixes There are some productive affixes that are synonymous with open class words. For example, the -re in reread (or re-read) "read again" or the co- in co-develop "develop with". There is the beginnings of a consensus that we should include these in wordnet, so it would be good to have them in lemon, For non-English, Japanese -者 '-er' (as in 労働者 labor-er) is another often discussed example (and is in the Japanese Wordnet already). It's conventional to have a '-' showing if it is an affix or a suffix, it may be better to have that as an attribute on the lexeme (which would make it easier to cover languages with circumfixes and infixes). >> Hi all, >> >> Due to the large number of resources using the previous Monnet /lemon >> /vocabulary it seems natural that we should support users who wish to >> transition to the W3C OntoLex /lemon /vocabulary. As such I was looking >> >> into the conversion. >> >> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Monnet_OntoLex_Compatibility >> >> There are some areas where the previous model has significant >> differences that we should consider whether to adopt. (Of course I do >> not assume that everything in Monnet Lemon should be transferred across >> but we should attempt to be able to represent relevant use cases already >> addressed by Monnet Lemon). >> >> From my analysis, there are two main issues that we should still address >> >> * Monnet /lemon/ has more sophisticated description of senses, in >> >> particular, mechanisms such as contexts >> <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node11.html>, conditions >> <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node30.html>, definitions, >> examples and incompatibility >> <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node14.html> >> * Monnet /lemon/ allows us to say if a lexical entry is a multi-word >> >> expression, affix or word. >> >> Any comments on whether we should allow this modelling >> >> Regards, >> John > > > -- Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/> Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies Nanyang Technological University
Received on Sunday, 8 June 2014 09:36:35 UTC