- From: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:14:52 +0200
- To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANzuSaPK0zqozUkqk32x8qrmfCx2-dVX7FpXe4ChUERPdSBP8A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Philipp, Let me add another issue for the first part 1.6) In ontolex:language, Is it better to have a URI as range instead of a String? See DCAT for instance http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Property:catalog_language Regards, Jorge 2014-06-06 8:59 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>: > Dear all, > > we have a few things to discuss today, I would propose splitting the > slot in two parts: > > 1) Discussion about ontolex changes (30 mins, with decisions on the single > points) > > 1.1) Introducing Lexicalization into the core model (decision) > 1.2) Naming the property between a "Lexical Sense" and a "Lexical > Concept"; contains was not regarded as appropriate by many, so proposals on > the table are: realizes/isRealizedBy, lexicalizes/isLexicalizedBy, > instantiates/isInstantiatedBy, substantiates/isSubstantiatedBy, > means/isMeaningOf as well as expresses/isExpressedBy; I am fine with at > least 3 of them ;-) > 1.3) Discussion: renaming property lexicalForm to simply "form" > 1.4) Discussion: introducing property "definition" as a subclass of > rdfs:comment with domain ontolex:LexicalSense > 1.5) Discussion: explicitly introducing the class "Reference" as the > range of "reference" as we have it anyway in most our diagrams; has no > practical neither theoretical implications other than clarity (IMHO) and > increasing the size of the module by one class > > 2) Discussion on lime proposal sent by Manuel/Armando (this assumes that > Armando will be there to walk us through) -> 30 mins. (no decision) > > Btw: I finally managed to find a nice tool to produce UML-style > visualizations of our models. It is called draw.io ;-) I attach a diagram > that reflects the current state of the ontolex module. The diagram is in > the GIT repo as well (where cardinalities are not indicated they are 0..n). > > I propose to postpone the discussion about Translation for another > occasion. I need to make up my mind myself there. I will send a separate > email on this. > > Access details can be found here as usual: https://www.w3.org/community/ > ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2014.06.06,_15-16_pm_CET > > Talk to you later! > > Philipp. > > -- > > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > > Phone: +49 521 106 12249 > Fax: +49 521 106 12412 > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) > Raum 2.307 > Universität Bielefeld > Inspiration 1 > 33619 Bielefeld > > -- Jorge Gracia, PhD Ontology Engineering Group Artificial Intelligence Department Universidad Politécnica de Madrid http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 13:15:40 UTC