W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > June 2014

Re: telco today at 15:00

From: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:14:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CANzuSaPK0zqozUkqk32x8qrmfCx2-dVX7FpXe4ChUERPdSBP8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Hi Philipp,

Let me add another issue for the first part

1.6) In ontolex:language, Is it better to have a URI as range instead of a
String? See DCAT for instance
http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Property:catalog_language

Regards,
Jorge




2014-06-06 8:59 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>:

> Dear all,
>
>  we have  a few things to discuss today, I would propose splitting the
> slot in two parts:
>
> 1) Discussion about ontolex changes (30 mins, with decisions on the single
> points)
>
>    1.1) Introducing Lexicalization into the core model (decision)
>    1.2) Naming the property between a "Lexical Sense" and a "Lexical
> Concept"; contains was not regarded as appropriate by many, so proposals on
> the table are: realizes/isRealizedBy, lexicalizes/isLexicalizedBy,
> instantiates/isInstantiatedBy, substantiates/isSubstantiatedBy,
> means/isMeaningOf as well as expresses/isExpressedBy; I am fine with at
> least 3 of them ;-)
>    1.3) Discussion: renaming property lexicalForm to simply "form"
>    1.4) Discussion: introducing property "definition" as a subclass of
> rdfs:comment with domain ontolex:LexicalSense
>    1.5) Discussion: explicitly introducing the class "Reference" as the
> range of "reference" as we have it anyway in most our diagrams; has no
> practical neither theoretical implications other than clarity (IMHO) and
> increasing the size of the module by one class
>
> 2) Discussion on lime proposal sent by Manuel/Armando (this assumes that
> Armando will be there to walk us through) -> 30 mins. (no decision)
>
> Btw: I finally managed to find a nice tool to produce UML-style
> visualizations of our models. It is called draw.io ;-) I attach a diagram
> that reflects the current state of the ontolex module. The diagram is in
> the GIT repo as well (where cardinalities are not indicated they are 0..n).
>
> I propose to postpone the discussion about Translation for another
> occasion. I need to make up my mind myself there. I will send a separate
> email on this.
>
> Access details can be found here as usual: https://www.w3.org/community/
> ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2014.06.06,_15-16_pm_CET
>
> Talk to you later!
>
> Philipp.
>
> --
>
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>
> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
> Raum 2.307
> Universit├Ąt Bielefeld
> Inspiration 1
> 33619 Bielefeld
>
>


-- 
Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Polit├ęcnica de Madrid
http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 13:15:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:40 UTC