W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > June 2014

Re: telco today at 15:00

From: John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:34:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC5njqra8Va1NcrKdXKTx9G0dhv6hBytkjjVYitWUdKrZ-zVNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Hi,

So a quick expansion on one of the points:

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Philipp Cimiano <
cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:

>
>    1.3) Discussion: renaming property lexicalForm to simply "form"
>
In *lemon *(OntoLex or Monnet) we have a common issue that we wish to call
a property and a range the same thing. There is a solution to simply
capitalizes the class e.g., (sense, Sense). We (Monnet) rejected this
option as we felt it was not clear and may lead to technical issues. As
such we generally inserted a word before the class name to help in
disambiguation, e.g.,

   - sense/LexicalSense
   - definition/SenseDefinition
   - example/SenseExample

For the case of form we actually decided to go for a longer property name
(it was discussed in quite some depth at the time). The reason for this is
that the lexicalForm property is 'abstract' in the sense that users should
not use this property but one of its subproperties (canonicalForm,
otherForm, etc.), as such we went with the following pair:

   - lexicalForm/Form

I think that for the same reasons as Monnet and to help backward
compatibility we should keep to the Monnet decision.

Regards,
John


   1.4) Discussion: introducing property "definition" as a subclass of
> rdfs:comment with domain ontolex:LexicalSense
>    1.5) Discussion: explicitly introducing the class "Reference" as the
> range of "reference" as we have it anyway in most our diagrams; has no
> practical neither theoretical implications other than clarity (IMHO) and
> increasing the size of the module by one class
>
> 2) Discussion on lime proposal sent by Manuel/Armando (this assumes that
> Armando will be there to walk us through) -> 30 mins. (no decision)
>
> Btw: I finally managed to find a nice tool to produce UML-style
> visualizations of our models. It is called draw.io ;-) I attach a diagram
> that reflects the current state of the ontolex module. The diagram is in
> the GIT repo as well (where cardinalities are not indicated they are 0..n).
>
> I propose to postpone the discussion about Translation for another
> occasion. I need to make up my mind myself there. I will send a separate
> email on this.
>
> Access details can be found here as usual: https://www.w3.org/community/
> ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2014.06.06,_15-16_pm_CET
>
> Talk to you later!
>
> Philipp.
>
> --
>
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>
> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
> Raum 2.307
> Universit├Ąt Bielefeld
> Inspiration 1
> 33619 Bielefeld
>
>
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 11:34:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:40 UTC