Re: synsem module

Dear Philipp

Hopefully both of us should be available (internet connection permitting)
for the Friday telco.

Cheers,

Fahad


On 27 August 2014 13:50, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
wrote:

>  Hi Faha, Francesca,
>
>  thanks a lot of this. I propose we discuss this on Friday during our
> regular telco at 15:00 (CET). I will send out access details today or
> tomorrow.
>
> Can you both or at least one of you make it to the telcon to walk us over
> the example?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Philipp.
>
> Am 26.08.14 16:06, schrieb Fahad Khan:
>
> Dear Philipp
>
>  We've tried to put our money where our mouth is so here is a rough and
> ready version in RDF of the buy/sell example  as well as a diagram of part
> of the example, as inspired by a more LMF type aproach:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dojqhFMHTswFWUarQAbeVo3ap6_UjDLyN9gTPydqr_g/edit
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Fahad & Francesca
>
>
> On 22 August 2014 10:37, Fahad Khan <anasfkhan81@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Philipp,
>> Sorry for the delay in responding,  we have been on holiday too the last
>> couple of weeks.  We were planning to send something to the list before we
>> went away, but it turns out the translation was harder to do than we
>> thought (and our collective knowledge of lmf less comprehensive) and we
>> weren't entirely happy with what we came up with.  However we will send you
>> a slightly polished version of our proposed example next week before the
>> telco -- after having hopefully discussed it with colleagues far more well
>> versed in lmf than us.
>> Cheers
>> Fahad and Francesca
>>   Dear all,
>>
>>    I returned from holidays end of last week. Given that some people are
>> still on holidays, I propose we have our next telco on Friday 29th at the
>> regular slot, i.e. 15:00 (CET). I will send out an announcement soon.
>>
>> @Fahad and Francesca: regarding our email thread before the holidays,
>> would you please be so kind to send an example of the modelling of frames
>> that is in your view appropriate, an LMF document would be fine for now so
>> that we can study the LMF modelling in more detail in the next telco and
>> then propose appropriate vocabulary elements in the synsem module to do the
>> job. Starting from LMF seems a good idea to me as I mentione a few weeks
>> ago.
>>
>> I will continue working with the vartrans and metadata modules from next
>> week on until we receive the input form Fahad and Francesca to continue the
>> work on the synsem module.
>>
>> I regard the ontolex and decomp modules as largely finished. Please check
>> the ontologies and examples carefully so that we can soon agree to release
>> them.
>>
>> Looking forward to continuing with our work.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>> Am 02.08.14 18:46, schrieb Manuel Fiorelli:
>>
>>  Hi Philipp, All
>>
>>  sorry for the delayed response, which is in fact quite simple.  See
>> below.
>>
>> 2014-08-01 11:53 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <
>> cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>:
>>
>>>
>>> Am 01.08.14 00:10, schrieb Manuel Fiorelli:
>>>
>>>   My objection is that you split the description of the semantic frame
>>> into two blocks. In each block, you associated the frame with subframes,
>>> each one associating a semantic role with a syntactic argument. Having
>>> these two blocks, I can easily understand that the semantic frame has three
>>> roles, which maps to the syntactic arguments. Conversely, it I consider
>>> these two blocks together, as they are in reality, then I am not sure I can
>>> easily spot the "shape" of the semantic frame.
>>>
>>>    Yes, that is the only objection I can see so far as well. Let's give
>>> a deeper look at this after the holidays, ok?
>>>
>>
>>  I used the word "objection", which is quite a strong word. Maybe
>> "observation" would have been a better choice. Nevertheless, I agree with
>> you that we can continue the discussion after the holidays.
>>
>>  Meanwhile, happy holidays to everybody listening to this thread, and
>> the rest of the OntoLex community :-D
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>> AG Semantic Computing
>> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>> Universität Bielefeld
>>
>> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
>> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>
>> Office CITEC-2.307
>> Universitätsstr. 21-25
>> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>> Germany
>>
>>
>
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
>
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
>
>