Re: summary of state-of-play

Dear Philipp, all,

Thanks for the "state-of-play" document and the summary of the document 
at http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Core_Model

I just went through it and in general I agree with the model proposed.
I have two comments that we may discuss on Friday.

  * what is the meaning of the "commitsTo" relation? Could it also be
    established between an OntologyEntity and a skos:Concept?
  * I am not sure I fully understand the relation between LexicalConcept
    and skos:Concept (sorry if you already discussed it!!). Wouldn't a
    LexicalConcept be also subsuming a skos:Concept? I think a
    LexicalConcept is somehow more general, am I mistaken?

Talk to you on Friday!
Elena

El 21/06/2013 15:30, Philipp Cimiano escribió:
> Dear all,
>
>  we had a very short meeting today. Apologies for the very late 
> announcement on my side. I will announce the meeting earlier next week.
>
> In any case, we agreed that it is good that the model as it stands can 
> accomodate both the view of Frames as Extensional Entitites / Class 
> (i.e. sets of situations) and the view as intensional/cognitive 
> Lexical Concepts.
>
> I feel that we need not to adopt any strong position towards any of 
> these ends as FrameNet has been anyway modelled by different people in 
> OWL/RDF already (Aldo, Alessandro, etc.) and it is certainly not the 
> main use of the ontolex model.
>
> In any case, the (short) minutes from today are here: 
> http://www.w3.org/2013/06/21-ontolex-minutes.html
>
> We will talk again next week at the usual time slot.
>
> Please all read my document and inspect the OWL ontology. We will 
> decide on this core very soon ;-)
>
> Have a good weekend,
>
> Philipp.
>

-- 
Elena Montiel-Ponsoda
Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Facultad de Informática
Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España
www.oeg-upm.net
Tel. (+34) 91 336 36 70
Fax  (+34) 91 352 48 19