Re: telco today at 15:00

Dear all,

  a first try to formalize the ontolex ontology attached.

For our discussion in 10 mins.

Philipp.

Am 21.06.13 14:40, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
> It's the ontology prefixed as "semio:" in your picture:
>
> http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/semiotics.owl
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:29:28 PM , Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Aldo,
>>
>> yes, is-a means subClassOf, sorry.
>>
>> Can you send me the URL under which I find semiotics.owl please?
>>
>> On the evokes, we will discuss it I guess. I am not sure why we need a specific one for FN.
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>> Am 21.06.13 14:17, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
>>> Thx Philipp, I'll attend at least part of the telecon.
>>> I anticipate that the core model looks fine to me. Just minor suggestions:
>>>
>>> 1) where you write is-a, it'd be "subClassOf" I guess
>>> 2) skos:Concept may be subClassOf semio:Meaning for completeness of alignment to semiotics.owl
>>>
>>> Concerning FrameNet "evokes", your interpretation is the same as mine, except that if we want to extend it beyond FrameNet, we need two properties:
>>>
>>> evokes(generic) -> domain ontolex:LexicalEntry, range ontolex:LexicalConcept
>>> evokes(specific to FN) -> domain fnschema:LexUnit, range fnschema:Frame (subClassOf ontolex:LexicalSense)
>>>
>>> Ciao
>>> Aldo
>>>
>>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 1:46:43 PM , Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> we will have our telco as usual today at 15:00 (CET).
>>>>
>>>> I would like to discuss the document: http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Core_Model
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Core_Model
>>>>
>>>> I will send an OWL ontology in the next minutes.
>>>>
>>>> I would also like to discuss the FrameNet modelling proposal by Alessandro (if he is there?)
>>>>
>>>> Access details are here as usual:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2013.21.06,_15-16_pm_CET
>>>>
>>>> Concerning the evokes discussion, to me the evokes relation is one between a Lexical Entry (Lexical Unit) and a Lexical Concept, but this relation is not really specific to (FrameNet) frames. See my diagram at: http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Core_Model
>>>>
>>>> I will be able to stay today at the telco only until 15:30 unfortunately. I hope we can clarify the main issues until then.
>>>>
>>>> Talk to you later,
>>>>
>>>> Philipp.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>>>> Semantic Computing Group
>>>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>>>> University of Bielefeld
>>>>
>>>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>>>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
>>>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>>>
>>>> Room H-127
>>>> Morgenbreede 39
>>>> 33615 Bielefeld
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>> Semantic Computing Group
>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>> University of Bielefeld
>>
>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>
>> Room H-127
>> Morgenbreede 39
>> 33615 Bielefeld
>>
>>


-- 
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
Semantic Computing Group
Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
University of Bielefeld

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Room H-127
Morgenbreede 39
33615 Bielefeld