- From: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:40:57 +0200
- To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>, "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
It's the ontology prefixed as "semio:" in your picture: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/semiotics.owl On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:29:28 PM , Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Hi Aldo, > > yes, is-a means subClassOf, sorry. > > Can you send me the URL under which I find semiotics.owl please? > > On the evokes, we will discuss it I guess. I am not sure why we need a specific one for FN. > > Philipp. > > Am 21.06.13 14:17, schrieb Aldo Gangemi: >> Thx Philipp, I'll attend at least part of the telecon. >> I anticipate that the core model looks fine to me. Just minor suggestions: >> >> 1) where you write is-a, it'd be "subClassOf" I guess >> 2) skos:Concept may be subClassOf semio:Meaning for completeness of alignment to semiotics.owl >> >> Concerning FrameNet "evokes", your interpretation is the same as mine, except that if we want to extend it beyond FrameNet, we need two properties: >> >> evokes(generic) -> domain ontolex:LexicalEntry, range ontolex:LexicalConcept >> evokes(specific to FN) -> domain fnschema:LexUnit, range fnschema:Frame (subClassOf ontolex:LexicalSense) >> >> Ciao >> Aldo >> >> On Jun 21, 2013, at 1:46:43 PM , Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> we will have our telco as usual today at 15:00 (CET). >>> >>> I would like to discuss the document: http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Core_Model >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Core_Model >>> >>> I will send an OWL ontology in the next minutes. >>> >>> I would also like to discuss the FrameNet modelling proposal by Alessandro (if he is there?) >>> >>> Access details are here as usual: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2013.21.06,_15-16_pm_CET >>> >>> Concerning the evokes discussion, to me the evokes relation is one between a Lexical Entry (Lexical Unit) and a Lexical Concept, but this relation is not really specific to (FrameNet) frames. See my diagram at: http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Core_Model >>> >>> I will be able to stay today at the telco only until 15:30 unfortunately. I hope we can clarify the main issues until then. >>> >>> Talk to you later, >>> >>> Philipp. >>> >>> -- >>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano >>> Semantic Computing Group >>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) >>> University of Bielefeld >>> >>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249 >>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412 >>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >>> >>> Room H-127 >>> Morgenbreede 39 >>> 33615 Bielefeld >>> >>> > > > -- > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > Semantic Computing Group > Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) > University of Bielefeld > > Phone: +49 521 106 12249 > Fax: +49 521 106 12412 > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > Room H-127 > Morgenbreede 39 > 33615 Bielefeld > >
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 12:41:24 UTC