RE: Issues about the semantics of the ontology-lexicon interface [was: Re: Why not to shortcut the "sense" object] from Armando Stellato on 2012-10-15 (public-ontolex@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:08:32 +0200
To: "'Armando Stellato'" <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>, "'Aldo Gangemi'" <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>, "'public-ontolex'" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Cc: "'John McCrae'" <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, "'Guido Vetere'" <gvetere@it.ibm.com>, "'Philipp Cimiano'" <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Message-ID: <045901cdab10$db9e3f20$92dabd60$@uniroma2.it>

Small amendment to what previously said:

[CUT]. Or better, the sense of a word is a link to a synset (which,
practically, in Wordnet is more than just a set of words, and more close to
a referent of the world).

 

Obviously not the referent, Ogden and Richards would have something to
oppose..

Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 20:09:08 UTC