- From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 21:59:17 +1000
- To: "public-odrl@w3.org Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>
- Cc: Jim Larson <jim42@larson-tech.com>, Bruce Epstien <bepstein@bfd.fr>, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@gmail.com>
Could we add “Siri” (the party) as the Assignee in the Duty action? R > On 3 Jun 2022, at 19:23, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > But if the assignee is Jim, wouldn't (since not indicated otherwise) the duty of validating his voice be his obligation too? Rather than Siri having to validate his voice before acting on his commands.. > > In the end it probably depends on who the intended target audience for the policy is.. Should they be used to guide the operation of voice systems, or should they be used to tell users what they have to do in order to be able to use the systems. > > br, simon >
Received on Friday, 3 June 2022 11:59:38 UTC