- From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:23:40 +1000
- To: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
Hi Sarven, that is not a use case we covered. An ODRL Policy with a target URI is focussed on the resource at that URI, not the URI itself. Perhaps, something like the W3C Provenance Ontology would work? R > On 27 Sep 2018, at 22:09, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've just started to look into ODRL, exciting stuff... and so I wanted > to apply it right away =) > > What I would like to describe is a URI persistence policy for my website > along the lines of https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence , maybe > with some constraints. So, I suppose the following starts it off: > > <http://csarven.ca/> > odrl:hasPolicy <...#policy-persistence> . > > If I'm not mistaken, I didn't see a use case around persistence being > mentioned at: > > * https://www.w3.org/TR/poe-ucr/ > * https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Use_Cases > > Is it already covered (elsewhere)? > > I'd like to describe the following: > > * what I pledge to do towards the longevity and accessibility of the URIs; > * what happens to the URIs once I cease to exist > > > Is ODRL appropriate for this or should I look into something else? > > Thanks! > > -Sarven > http://csarven.ca/#i >
Received on Monday, 1 October 2018 12:24:10 UTC