- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:47:20 +1000
- To: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- Cc: Public Odrl <public-odrl@w3.org>
> On 21 Jan 2015, at 19:33, Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at> wrote: > > But that would in general contradict the ODRL core model as stated in [2] if I'm not mistaken? Yes, that breaks the model, as it does not directly link the obligation of the Duty on performing the Permission actions. See the "Offer" example here as a way to express this: http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/#sec-example-2 Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 05:47:55 UTC