- From: Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:09:05 -0500
- To: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Cc: "public-odrl@w3.org Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>
Who will sit on the nest? Time will tell... Cindy > On Jan 21, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net> wrote: > > On 1/21/15 9:28 AM, Myles, Stuart wrote: >> These are questions about schema.org. At present, schema.org (and >> hence the search engines which implement it) do not support ODRL >> type statements. Given that, I believe these FAQs are relevant, >> since they talk about how schema.org plans to evolve: > > Thank you Stuart. I had skimmed parts of that FAQ but you've identified the relevant parts that I missed. > > It appears then that after a decade of incubation of ODRL, in terms of wide adoption by search engines, it's still a chicken-and-egg problem -- there will be wide adoption in main search engines when there's wide usage, and there will be wide usage when there's wide adoption in main search engines... :-) > > The egg appears to be healthy and warm, though, so there's still hope! :-) . > > > Steven R. >
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 22:09:39 UTC