- From: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:33:49 +0100
- To: Public Odrl <public-odrl@w3.org>
Hi!
Using ODRL to represent license declarations, (sometimes) requires the
use of duties without "attaching" them to respective permissions (cf.
[1]).
For example, the policy defined underneath represents a CC-BY-NC
license:
:licCC-BY-NC a odrl:Set;
odrl:permission [
a odrl:Permission;
odrl:action odrl:reprodice;
odrl:action odrl:distribute;
odrl:action odrl:derive
] ;
odrl:prohibition [
a odrl:Prohibition;
odrl:action odrl:commercialize
] ;
odrl:duty [
a odrl:Duty;
odrl:action odrl:attribute;
odrl:action odrl:attachPolicy
] .
But that would in general contradict the ODRL core model as stated in
[2] if I'm not mistaken? (Assuming the representation of the
relationship between Asset & Policy uses the wrong arc)
So what's the general consensus about that?
cheers,
simon
[1]
http://2014.eswc-conferences.org/sites/default/files/papers/paper_168.pdf
[2] http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/files/2014/05/Version2.png
--
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 09:34:14 UTC