- From: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:33:49 +0100
- To: Public Odrl <public-odrl@w3.org>
Hi! Using ODRL to represent license declarations, (sometimes) requires the use of duties without "attaching" them to respective permissions (cf. [1]). For example, the policy defined underneath represents a CC-BY-NC license: :licCC-BY-NC a odrl:Set; odrl:permission [ a odrl:Permission; odrl:action odrl:reprodice; odrl:action odrl:distribute; odrl:action odrl:derive ] ; odrl:prohibition [ a odrl:Prohibition; odrl:action odrl:commercialize ] ; odrl:duty [ a odrl:Duty; odrl:action odrl:attribute; odrl:action odrl:attachPolicy ] . But that would in general contradict the ODRL core model as stated in [2] if I'm not mistaken? (Assuming the representation of the relationship between Asset & Policy uses the wrong arc) So what's the general consensus about that? cheers, simon [1] http://2014.eswc-conferences.org/sites/default/files/papers/paper_168.pdf [2] http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/files/2014/05/Version2.png -- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 09:34:14 UTC