- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:56:21 +0100
- To: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
Thx! simon --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2015-02-25 09:41, schrieb Víctor Rodríguez Doncel: > I think this is the way it should be understood. > > However, within the "W3C Linked Data for Language Technologies" a > deprecated term (odrl:derive) has been preferred over the new one, as > the old definition was seen by lawyers more precise than the > CreativeCommons'... > > Víctor > > > El 25/02/2015 a las 8:43, Simon Steyskal escribió: >> Hi! >> >> While browsing through the new ODRL 2.1 Specification I saw there were >> some major changes regarding Actions and I was wondering whether I >> understand those correctly.. >> Does e.g. "Action share (see CC vocabulary)" mean that we should now >> use cc:Sharing instead of the now deprecated odrl:share to indicate a >> possible share action? >> >> cheers, simon >>
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 08:56:47 UTC