- From: Michael Steidl \(IPTC\) <mdirector@iptc.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:47:01 +0200
- To: "'ODRL Community Group'" <public-odrl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00ec01cfede5$82e45710$88ad0530$@iptc.org>
Group: We've been pointed at an inconsistency of the Actions read/writeTo/appendTo - read is about reading any data from an asset - writeTo is about adding data to an asset - appendTo is about appending data to an asset - and is a narrower term of writeTo But: there is no Action to cover editing/changing existing data. Solution 1: - add an Action "edit" for editing/changing existing data - make writeTo a narrower term of it Solution 2: - redefine writeTo to cover editing/changing existing data - drop appendTo . - . and add this Action: name: addTo definition: adding data to an asset at any location Please comment: - should we stick to the current definitions - if not: should we adopt either solution 1 or solution 2 Thanks, Michael Michael Steidl Managing Director of the IPTC [mdirector@iptc.org] International Press Telecommunications Council Web: <http://www.iptc.org/> www.iptc.org - on Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/IPTC> @IPTC Business office address: 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL, United Kingdom Registered in England, company no 101096
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2014 10:47:28 UTC