Feedback on the ODRL Ontology draft spec

These editorial comments are primarily aimed at aligning the ODRL Ontology spec with the Common Vocabulary spec.

1 - Update title to "ODRL Version 2.1 Ontology"

2 - The "Offer", "Agreement", and "Offer and next Policy" scenario examples need to update the pay duty to compensate and use a constraint for the payAmount (not an asset)

3 - The "Multiple assets" scenario example needs to define x:collection as a o:relation sub-property

4 - The "event" property also defines a specific value ("playUsage") - need to add this

5 - All of the Actions need their definitions to be updated (copy/paste from the Common Vocab document) as we have updated all the definitions (from "grantUse" right up to "watermark")

6 - "aggregate", "annotate", and "anonymize" have Broader Term "use"

7 - deprecate "appendTo", "lease", "lend", "preview", "secondaryUse", and "writeTo"

8 - deprecate "copy" and recommend to use "reproduce"

9 - "display" is not equivalent to "execute" (and vice-versa)

10 - deprecate "export" and recommend to use "transform"

11 - deprecate "license" and recommend to use "grantUse"

12 - "modify" is not equivalent to "derive" (and vice-versa)

13 - deprecate "pay" and recommend to use "compensate"

14 - "play" is not equivalent to "present" - "present" is a Broader Term

15 - "present" - move "play" from equivalent to narrower term

16 - add "transfer" and "use” actions (these need to be explicitly defined in the Common Vocab as well)


Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206