- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:51:36 +1000
- To: Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 10:52:05 UTC
On 29 Jul 2013, at 18:47, Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > I'd agree, and this is why I don't think a direct inverse is applicable ? however, I do think some sort of inverse relationship should exist. I think we agree, but not sure what it is exactly...so lets just add it as a "todo" for now (for the next draft) ? Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 10:52:05 UTC