On 2013-Jul-29, at 09:44, V?ctor Rodr?guez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
wrote:
> El 28/07/2013 16:34, Mo McRoberts escribi?:
>> 1. Would it be valid to say that odrl:target is an inverse of dcterms:license or dcterms:rights ?
>
> I would like to recall how the ODRL 1.1 specification document started:
> The Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) is a proposed language for the Digital Rights Management (DRM) community for the standardisation of expressing rights information over content
> And how ODRL 2.0 is defined:
> The ODRL policy expression language [...]
> I'd say that "rights expressions" are narrower than "policies" and we must acknowledge this.
> It is a pity that the initiative of XACML towards RDF didn't show more progress than this: [1], to see its view.
I'd agree, and this is why I don't think a direct inverse is applicable ? however, I do think some sort of inverse relationship should exist.
M.
--
Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development,
Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA,
MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E
-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------