On 2013-Jul-26, at 14:36, V?ctor Rodr?guez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es> wrote:
> Well, of course Asset must exist. But your sentence...
> The act of associating a policy with it is what defines it as an ODRL asset.
> ...can be represented very simply and elegantly, with just three statements:
>
> <Asset> rdf:type owl:Class .
> <vocab:target> rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
> rdfs:range <Asset> .
>
> Everything that is related to with a "vocab:target" is automatically inferred to be an Asset.
Okay, given the discussion ? I'll drop the equivalentClass to owl:Thing on :Asset (the range of :target, amongst other things, is already :Asset).
M.
--
Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development,
Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA,
MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E
-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------