Re: ODRL target/Dublin Core license/rights

El 28/07/2013 16:34, Mo McRoberts escribió:
> 1. Would it be valid to say that odrl:target is an inverse of dcterms:license or dcterms:rights ?

I would like to recall how the ODRL 1.1 specification document started:

    The Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) is a proposed language for
    the Digital Rights Management (DRM) community for the
    standardisation of expressing rights information over content

And how ODRL 2.0 is defined:

    The ODRL policy expression language [...]

I'd say that "rights expressions" are narrower than "policies" and we 
must acknowledge this.
It is a pity that the initiative of XACML towards RDF didn't show more 
progress than this: [1], to see its view.

Regards,
Víctor


[1] https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xacml/XACMLandRDF

-- 
Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Facultad de Informática
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34) 91336 3672
Skype: vroddon3