- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:36:22 +0200
- To: public-odrl@w3.org
I fully agree with this view. But I would like to highlight that the direction of the relation is not a minor issue. Shall we explicitly define the inverse of odrl:target? Regards, Víctor El 29/07/2013 9:29, Mo McRoberts escribió: > i.e., where the ODRL policy fits the definition of a 'Rights document' or a 'License document' as defined by Dublin Core (and we should probably look at inserting the appropriate superclass relationships into the model accordingly), then consider it valid to use dct:rights or dct:license. In other situations, in the absence of any other obvious predicate with that directionality, one must use odrl:target instead. -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 08:37:03 UTC