- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:18:11 +1000
- To: Daniel Pähler <tulkas@uni-koblenz.de>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
On 3 Jul 2012, at 01:45, Daniel Pähler wrote: > The problem is that the Core Model defines that each Permission or Prohibition > must have at least one Asset. Changing something in the Core Model that does > not simply refine it but actually conflicts with it should be done in a profile, > I would say. Another option maybe to allow the use of Set as the Policy Type and include the asset element with a null UID? Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 05:18:47 UTC