- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 15:32:34 +1000
- To: ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>
On 21 Jun 2012, at 06:07, ODRL Community Group Issue Tracker wrote: > As the example 4.6 of the XML Encoding page of the ODRL specs (http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/xml/) shows the concrete value of a license fee has to be expressed as Asset. > As licensing fees a) are flexible and b) a very large amount of them exist IPTC members raised the business requirement to have a more flexible way for expressing such literal values in ODRL. > We could think about adding attributes like @valuetype, @value and @valueunit to the asset element and to define some indicator (e.g. a special @relation value) for this use case. Hi michael - we purposely did not define any semantics/structure for payments (as we felt this would be domain specific) so instead we simply said that a payment can be expressed as an Asset. The examples show assets from the UBL schema, but more complex payments (and terms) can be expressed using Good Relations [1]. Can you give an example of the additional attributes you mention and what they would represent? Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 [1] http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1#PriceSpecification
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2012 05:33:01 UTC