Re: Merged a lot

Yeas that is just what I was suggesting.

Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
On Jan 14, 2013 10:48 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com> wrote:

> It was a git pull – so just an update.
>
> I had to make modifications to both grunt-contrib-qunit and
> grunt-contrib-uglify, due to the Grunt API changes.
>
> As a stopgap I'm going to commit node_modules. This way we all have the
> same stuff. Once Grunt becomes stabilized we can drop them from the tree.
>
>
>
> From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, January 14, 2013 8:36 AM
> To: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>
> Cc: "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Merged a lot
>
> Did it get you node_modules or are you using what I sent you?  In other
> words, did you try a fresh one or just an update?
>
> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
> On Jan 14, 2013 10:26 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I pulled the latest this morning and the build was just fine.
>>
>> From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
>> Date: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:09 PM
>> To: "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
>> Subject: Merged a lot
>> Resent-From: <public-nextweb@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:10:05 +0000
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I've merged Marco's pull request... Despite the fact that all of the
>> issues say "implement" which Marcos clearly has accomplished, I didn't
>> follow through and close them because a couple of them had open
>> comments/notes... Francois, can you just quickly take a look through the
>> ones where Marcos had a question and maybe determine if you would like to
>> make note of it, open a new issue on it or whatever?  I don't want to lose
>> the open questions...
>>
>> I'd like to close these out and get some test suite running them thatso
>> that we can have the edge/fringe sort of debates and have something we can
>> safely rework if necessary... The current tests only check that an item
>> exists and, well - the test harnessing itself seems broken to me.
>>
>> To that end: can someone verify that the build is borked?  I was unable
>> to run it ... jshint which complains for me on the webidl file iteself, not
>> anything recently added because of the Function constructor and use of
>> __proto__...
>>
>> I was able to put them into a local server and manually make the
>> adjustments/copies that the build work and things worked fine though...
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
>>
>