Re: Merged a lot

It was a git pull ­ so just an update.

I had to make modifications to both grunt-contrib-qunit and
grunt-contrib-uglify, due to the Grunt API changes.

As a stopgap I'm going to commit node_modules. This way we all have the same
stuff. Once Grunt becomes stabilized we can drop them from the tree.



From:  Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date:  Monday, January 14, 2013 8:36 AM
To:  Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>
Cc:  "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Merged a lot


Did it get you node_modules or are you using what I sent you?  In other
words, did you try a fresh one or just an update?

Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com <http://hitchjs.com>

On Jan 14, 2013 10:26 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com> wrote:
> I pulled the latest this morning and the build was just fine.
> 
> From:  Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
> Date:  Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:09 PM
> To:  "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
> Subject:  Merged a lot
> Resent-From:  <public-nextweb@w3.org>
> Resent-Date:  Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:10:05 +0000
> 
> Guys,
> 
> I've merged Marco's pull request... Despite the fact that all of the issues
> say "implement" which Marcos clearly has accomplished, I didn't follow through
> and close them because a couple of them had open comments/notes... Francois,
> can you just quickly take a look through the ones where Marcos had a question
> and maybe determine if you would like to make note of it, open a new issue on
> it or whatever?  I don't want to lose the open questions...
> 
> I'd like to close these out and get some test suite running them thatso that
> we can have the edge/fringe sort of debates and have something we can safely
> rework if necessary... The current tests only check that an item exists and,
> well - the test harnessing itself seems broken to me.
> 
> To that end: can someone verify that the build is borked?  I was unable to run
> it ... jshint which complains for me on the webidl file iteself, not anything
> recently added because of the Function constructor and use of __proto__...
> 
> I was able to put them into a local server and manually make the
> adjustments/copies that the build work and things worked fine though...
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com <http://hitchjs.com/>