Re: Merged a lot

Hi Clint,  
Stupid question, but my grunt doesn't like "GruntFile.js" … it's looking for 'grunt.js' so I get an grunt.js file not found error.  

Am I out of date or something?   


--  
Marcos Caceres


On Monday, January 14, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:

> Yeas that is just what I was suggesting.
> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com (http://hitchjs.com)
> On Jan 14, 2013 10:48 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com (mailto:clint.hill@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > It was a git pull – so just an update.  
> >  
> > I had to make modifications to both grunt-contrib-qunit and grunt-contrib-uglify, due to the Grunt API changes.  
> >  
> > As a stopgap I'm going to commit node_modules. This way we all have the same stuff. Once Grunt becomes stabilized we can drop them from the tree.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com (mailto:bkardell@gmail.com)>
> > Date: Monday, January 14, 2013 8:36 AM
> > To: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com (mailto:clint.hill@gmail.com)>
> > Cc: "public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)" <public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > Subject: Re: Merged a lot
> >  
> > Did it get you node_modules or are you using what I sent you? In other words, did you try a fresh one or just an update?
> > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com (http://hitchjs.com)
> > On Jan 14, 2013 10:26 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com (mailto:clint.hill@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > I pulled the latest this morning and the build was just fine.
> > >  
> > > From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com (mailto:bkardell@gmail.com)>
> > > Date: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:09 PM
> > > To: "public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)" <public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > Subject: Merged a lot
> > > Resent-From: <public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:10:05 +0000
> > >  
> > > Guys,
> > >  
> > > I've merged Marco's pull request... Despite the fact that all of the issues say "implement" which Marcos clearly has accomplished, I didn't follow through and close them because a couple of them had open comments/notes... Francois, can you just quickly take a look through the ones where Marcos had a question and maybe determine if you would like to make note of it, open a new issue on it or whatever? I don't want to lose the open questions...  
> > >  
> > > I'd like to close these out and get some test suite running them thatso that we can have the edge/fringe sort of debates and have something we can safely rework if necessary... The current tests only check that an item exists and, well - the test harnessing itself seems broken to me.  
> > >  
> > > To that end: can someone verify that the build is borked? I was unable to run it ... jshint which complains for me on the webidl file iteself, not anything recently added because of the Function constructor and use of __proto__...  
> > >  
> > > I was able to put them into a local server and manually make the adjustments/copies that the build work and things worked fine though...
> > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> > > --  
> > > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com (http://hitchjs.com/)
> >  
>

Received on Monday, 14 January 2013 16:09:32 UTC