- From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:31:53 +0000
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>, public-native-web-apps@w3.org
On 28 Feb 2012, at 15:38, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:42 +0100, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sounds fine to me. >> >> We've implemented Updates (its lurking in Wookie, but undocumented), but it will be a while before I imagine see it being used in anger in a way that would contribute to pushing the spec towards Recc. > > We have implemented and use updates, and fix bugs in anger if we find them. I think there might be enough to take it to Rec, and I think that could be a good idea... I'm happy to upload our test results to the implementation report - that would be a start in terms of seeing where we've got to. > > cheers > >> On 28 Feb 2012, at 13:17, Marcos Caceres wrote: >> >>> Fyi comments welcome. >>> >>> >>> Forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> >>>> To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org> >>>> Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:32:04 PM >>>> Subject: [widgets] Request for a CFC about Widget URI and Updates >>>> >>>> I think it might be time to have a CFC to propose moving Widget URI and Widget Updates to WG Notes. Although both specs have gotten implemented, I'm not interested in continuing the work unless I have industry backing. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Marcos >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group > je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:32:30 UTC