Re: [widgets] Request for a CFC about Widget URI and Updates

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:42 +0100, Scott Wilson  
<scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds fine to me.
>
> We've implemented Updates (its lurking in Wookie, but undocumented), but  
> it will be a while before I imagine see it being used in anger in a way  
> that would contribute to pushing the spec towards Recc.

We have implemented and use updates, and fix bugs in anger if we find  
them. I think there might be enough to take it to Rec, and I think that  
could be a good idea...

cheers

> On 28 Feb 2012, at 13:17, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>> Fyi… comments welcome.
>>
>>
>> Forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
>>> To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
>>> Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:32:04 PM
>>> Subject: [widgets] Request for a CFC about Widget URI and Updates
>>>
>>> I think it might be time to have a CFC to propose moving Widget URI  
>>> and Widget Updates to WG Notes. Although both specs have gotten  
>>> implemented, I'm not interested in continuing the work unless I have  
>>> industry backing.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Marcos
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 15:39:17 UTC