- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:27:30 +0100
- To: public-mwts@w3.org
We actually canceled the call, since both Till and Carmelo had sent regrets, and their presence for this agenda was fairly important. We did go through a quick action items review - reports embedded below. We'll hopefully be back to a more classical call next week. Le lundi 19 février 2007 à 16:50 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux a écrit : > * Mobile Web Test Suites survey and re-packaging: > - ACTION: Dmitri to take SVG [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2007/01/30-mwts-minutes.html#action05] > DONE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mwts/2007Feb/0011.html We confirmed that this action item is done and can be removed from our tracking. Please follow-up on Dmitri's message if you want to comment on the findings that he made in his review. > - Open action items: > ACTION: Dmitri to try and see if he can run one of the test suites on > his development board [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-mwts-minutes.html#action05] Dmitri reported that the development boards in question don't have user agents installed, so they can't run the W3C test suites; we agreed this closed his action item as well. > ACTION: Dom to run DOM and CSS test suites on his phones [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-mwts-minutes.html#action02] I started to try the DOM test suite (but need to do more), and haven't started to try the CSS test suite; hopefully I should have more to report next week. > * Open framework for test suites on Authoring practices > ACTION: Dom to get feedback on the open test suite on authoring > practices from content developers [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-mwts-minutes.html#action08] I haven't made any progress, but I'm hoping to propose by next week a public survey (backed up by W3C's questionnaire system, WBS), that we would send out to the community to get feedback on the usefulness of such a project, as well as some leads on what kind of tests would be appropriate. > * Roadmap of deliverables > ACTION: Dom to turn the list of work items into a roadmap with a > schedule [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2007/01/25-mwts-minutes.html#action05] > DONE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mwts/2007Feb/0007.html > Feedback, discussions We still need to discuss this. > * Progress on scheduling next F2F > - Proposal: report sine die next F2F as per: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-mwts/2007Feb/0000.html > > related actions: > ACTION: Dom to figure out his availabilities in May [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2007/01/30-mwts-minutes.html#action11] > ACTION: Dom to set up a questionnaire on setting up a meeting in May > [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-mwts-minutes.html#action11] We haven't resolved formally yet to report the F2F (although nobody raised concern on the call when I mentioned it); but if so, this would make these action items moot. > * Teleconf schedule change notice > As the US have a different date at which they "spring forward" their > clocks as Europe (March 11 vs Mach 25), we'll have a couple of meetings > (March 13 and 20) where the time of our teleconference will change, > either for Europeans or for Americans; we need to pick which way can > work for as many of us as possible. > http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20070202081234.0503a600@127.0.0.1 I took the action item to give more details as to what possible times this would offer to us; I'll send that around quickly. Dom
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 16:28:07 UTC