- From: Chevrollier, N.G. (Nicolas) <nicolas.chevrollier@tno.nl>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:23:31 +0200
- To: "Stephane Boyera" <boyera@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-mw4d@w3.org>
Hi Stephane, Either way is fine as long as the technology section comes last. Best, Nicolas > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephane Boyera [mailto:boyera@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:30 PM > To: Chevrollier, N.G. (Nicolas) > Cc: public-mw4d@w3.org > Subject: Re: new updated roadmap available > > Hi Nicholas > > > Raphael, to make sure I understand. What you are proposing is: > > - main challenges (as already in Stephan's proposal) > > - technologies plus and minus (as already in Stephan's proposal) > > - relation between challenges and technology + on-going innovations and > R&D outlook > > > > If so I like it very much as putting the technology before the > challenges might be a bit confusing (as the technology addresses already > these challenges). > > I believe that challenges and technologies are relatively separated, and > each item of each section should have a part on on-going innovation and > R&D outlook. > What belongs to the challenges section are the characteristics of the > delivery context, but are not directly related to the technology, and > sometimes the answer is not in the technology field. one example: > illiteracy: if you want to deliver e.g. a service of weather forecast to > illiterate people, i believe you could find in the related entry in the > challenges section > - what's possible today > - use literate intermediaries (not a technology solution) > - use voice applications (specific technology recommendation) > - use graphics representation if applicable (this is not specific > to a > technology, graphic is a feature of more than one technology: web > browser, a dedicated j2me apps, widgets,... ) > - on longer term (R&D track) > - define standardized way of designing culturally relevant > meaningful icons > - define guidelines to make web content accessible to illiterate > people mixing icons and voice annotation > > So, personnaly, i don't think we should create the third part you are > mentionning. > > cheers > steph > > -- > Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org > W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 > BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 > F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, > France This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 06:24:16 UTC