- From: <Lauri.K.Hirvonen@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:29:19 +0200
- To: <boyera@w3.org>, <yoshiko.kurisaki@icvolunteers.org>
- CC: <jbrewer@w3.org>, <public-mw4d@w3.org>
Hello team I like to comment the cost (of operation of the mobile network). In less populated areas, it is very expensive to build mobile networks. In cities, big cities, it is much cheaper. (= more users to share the cost of building and operating mobile network.) This is also true in more developed countries like Finland. It is always the highest populated areas, that are built first. The less populated areas are the last one to be built. The government of Finland has mandated the mobile phone operator to offer services also to less populated areas. Operator do it by increasing the charges to everyone which allows them to built mobile coverage to less populated areas, where the pay-back by it's use is low. So populated cities are covering also the cost of running rural areas. This allows that the voice call tariffs are the same in big cities and in rural areas. I have heard, that in some "developing countries" the first operator to build a mobile network do make a contract with country government. Typically those contracts gives them "monopoly" for certain period. That means, that the government will not give license to an other mobile network operator. So no competition. But also government want their share. In many countries the mobile phone is listed in luxury item category and the taxation is high. They charge import custom tax for the product and it can be very high. (So end user has to pay higher price.) Also the mobile operator's center equipment can have this high import tax. It makes it for operator more expensive to pay back, this means again higher prices to users. This is often the situation to have the first mobile network in the country. Later when the "first operator is profitable and managed to cover most of the building costs" the country can allow new mobile operators to enter the country mobile market. This then increases competition and usually lower the price for use of mobile phone. It would be nice if organization like "World Bank" could offer loan for operator to built mobile network. The loan could be negotiated to cover longer period (to pay it back). This means, operator can offer the mobile service to users with lower prices. Br. Lauri >-----Original Message----- >From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-mw4d-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ext Stephane Boyera >Sent: 06 August, 2009 13:10 >To: Yoshiko Kurisaki >Cc: Judy Brewer; public-mw4d@w3.org >Subject: Re: MW4D & Accessibility > >Dear Yoshiko, > >thanks for your support. > >> Allow me to propose another point of accessibility, Network >> accessibility > >This is indeed a very important point. This is not really >accessibility in the sense it is described in the 6.1.1 >section, but the cost, due to monopoly is clearly an issue; >This will be covered in section 6.1.5 around costs > >best >Stephane > >-- >Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org >W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 >BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 >F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, >France > >
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 09:30:21 UTC