- From: Mira Slavova <mira@mmd4d.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:27:25 +0100
- To: Lauri.K.Hirvonen@nokia.com
- Cc: boyera@w3.org, yoshiko.kurisaki@icvolunteers.org, jbrewer@w3.org, public-mw4d@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4d9275350908100327l4b2f71f8n79eaddfc8c66caec@mail.gmail.com>
Dear All, Big thanks to Lauri for sharing his view of competition in the mobile industry! Given the recovery rates of the set-up costs of mobile networks in rural areas, I was wondering how the group sees the potential for the use of WiMAX in rural areas. Do you think that it might be a technology relevant to our roadmap? Thanks, Mira On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, <Lauri.K.Hirvonen@nokia.com> wrote: > Hello team > > I like to comment the cost (of operation of > the mobile network). > > In less populated areas, it is very expensive > to build mobile networks. > > In cities, big cities, it is much cheaper. > (= more users to share the cost of > building and operating mobile network.) > > This is also true in more developed countries > like Finland. It is always the highest populated > areas, that are built first. The less populated > areas are the last one to be built. > > The government of Finland has mandated the > mobile phone operator to offer services also > to less populated areas. Operator do it by > increasing the charges to everyone which > allows them to built mobile coverage to > less populated areas, where the pay-back > by it's use is low. So populated cities > are covering also the cost of running > rural areas. > > This allows that the voice call tariffs are > the same in big cities and in rural areas. > > I have heard, that in some "developing countries" > the first operator to build a mobile network > do make a contract with country government. > > Typically those contracts gives them "monopoly" > for certain period. That means, that the government > will not give license to an other mobile network > operator. So no competition. > > But also government want their share. In many > countries the mobile phone is listed in luxury > item category and the taxation is high. They > charge import custom tax for the product and > it can be very high. (So end user has to pay > higher price.) Also the mobile operator's > center equipment can have this high import > tax. It makes it for operator more > expensive to pay back, this means again > higher prices to users. > > This is often the situation to have the first > mobile network in the country. Later when the > "first operator is profitable and managed > to cover most of the building costs" the country > can allow new mobile operators to enter > the country mobile market. This then > increases competition and usually lower > the price for use of mobile phone. > > It would be nice if organization like "World Bank" > could offer loan for operator to built > mobile network. The loan could be negotiated > to cover longer period (to pay it back). This > means, operator can offer the mobile service > to users with lower prices. > > Br. Lauri > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org > >[mailto:public-mw4d-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ext Stephane Boyera > >Sent: 06 August, 2009 13:10 > >To: Yoshiko Kurisaki > >Cc: Judy Brewer; public-mw4d@w3.org > >Subject: Re: MW4D & Accessibility > > > >Dear Yoshiko, > > > >thanks for your support. > > > >> Allow me to propose another point of accessibility, Network > >> accessibility > > > >This is indeed a very important point. This is not really > >accessibility in the sense it is described in the 6.1.1 > >section, but the cost, due to monopoly is clearly an issue; > >This will be covered in section 6.1.5 around costs > > > >best > >Stephane > > > >-- > >Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org > >W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 > >BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 > >F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, > >France > > > > > -- Dr Mira Slavova ICT4D Consultant Mobile Market Design 4 Development mmd4d.org ++44 (0)7734 408829
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 10:28:07 UTC