- From: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:38:19 +0200
- To: Lauri.K.Hirvonen@nokia.com
- CC: yoshiko.kurisaki@icvolunteers.org, public-mw4d@w3.org
Hello Lauri, thanks a lot for your helpful comments. While i believe this is out of the scope of our roadmap to propose some ways to lower access costs to the infrastructure, there is still a section on costs and on infrastructure in the document. I just added some bits (section 6.1.5 and 6.1.6) related to the discussions. I also completed 6.1.7 As always, comments are welcome. Tak to you in few hours ! best Stephane Lauri.K.Hirvonen@nokia.com a écrit : > Hello team > > I like to comment the cost (of operation of > the mobile network). > > In less populated areas, it is very expensive > to build mobile networks. > > In cities, big cities, it is much cheaper. > (= more users to share the cost of > building and operating mobile network.) > > This is also true in more developed countries > like Finland. It is always the highest populated > areas, that are built first. The less populated > areas are the last one to be built. > > The government of Finland has mandated the > mobile phone operator to offer services also > to less populated areas. Operator do it by > increasing the charges to everyone which > allows them to built mobile coverage to > less populated areas, where the pay-back > by it's use is low. So populated cities > are covering also the cost of running > rural areas. > > This allows that the voice call tariffs are > the same in big cities and in rural areas. > > I have heard, that in some "developing countries" > the first operator to build a mobile network > do make a contract with country government. > > Typically those contracts gives them "monopoly" > for certain period. That means, that the government > will not give license to an other mobile network > operator. So no competition. > > But also government want their share. In many > countries the mobile phone is listed in luxury > item category and the taxation is high. They > charge import custom tax for the product and > it can be very high. (So end user has to pay > higher price.) Also the mobile operator's > center equipment can have this high import > tax. It makes it for operator more > expensive to pay back, this means again > higher prices to users. > > This is often the situation to have the first > mobile network in the country. Later when the > "first operator is profitable and managed > to cover most of the building costs" the country > can allow new mobile operators to enter > the country mobile market. This then > increases competition and usually lower > the price for use of mobile phone. > > It would be nice if organization like "World Bank" > could offer loan for operator to built > mobile network. The loan could be negotiated > to cover longer period (to pay it back). This > means, operator can offer the mobile service > to users with lower prices. > > Br. Lauri > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-mw4d-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ext Stephane Boyera >> Sent: 06 August, 2009 13:10 >> To: Yoshiko Kurisaki >> Cc: Judy Brewer; public-mw4d@w3.org >> Subject: Re: MW4D & Accessibility >> >> Dear Yoshiko, >> >> thanks for your support. >> >>> Allow me to propose another point of accessibility, Network >>> accessibility >> This is indeed a very important point. This is not really >> accessibility in the sense it is described in the 6.1.1 >> section, but the cost, due to monopoly is clearly an issue; >> This will be covered in section 6.1.5 around costs >> >> best >> Stephane >> >> -- >> Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org >> W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 >> BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 >> F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, >> France >> >> -- Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 09:38:25 UTC