- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:57:19 +0100
- To: Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>
- Cc: 'Yves Savourel' <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Pablo, Yves, all, I'm more than happy to close this issue. We just should be sure that the potentially large amount of "script" elements in HTML with the current approach doesn't bite us. I'd suggest that we give implementers max. 2 more weeks to think this through and then close this if there is no new info. Best, Felix On 2013-03-14 10:51, Pablo Nieto Caride wrote: > Good point Yves! I think that the option of having external files > with the standoff information could be very useful, for instance with > metadata such as Provenance where the number of records in a document > can be huge. > > Cheers, > Pablo. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Linked data got me to think about Felix' note about the possibility > of reversing the pointers for standoff markup: > > Currently we have an IRI in the content that points to the standoff > data. > The reverse would be to have an id in the content to which the > standoff data points to. > > One thing we would lose by reversing the direction would be the > capability to have standoff data in a different document than the one > where the content is: The processor would have no way to know what > would be the external files to process. > > I'm not sure if having standoff in external files is a must, but that > capability is there currently and I assume it could be handy in XML > cases where the host vocabulary doesn't allow to add embedded > standoff > ITS markup > > -ys
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 09:58:11 UTC