Re: FW: [All] high level use cases not yet ready to publish, please have another look - VistaTEC -

Christian

I've directly added some further information.

It would be good if you could add "Kevin Lew" and "Chase Tingley" as 
implementors to the list of authors.

Phil.





From:   "Lieske, Christian" <christian.lieske@sap.com>
To:     "philr@vistatec.ie" <philr@vistatec.ie>, 
Cc:     "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" 
<public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Date:   03/03/2013 09:29
Subject:        FW: [All] high level use cases not yet ready to publish, 
please    have  another look - VistaTEC -



Hi Phil,
 
While editing the section on “Harnessing ITS 2.0 Metadata” the following 
specific questions came up. Hopefully, it is alright to contact you with 
them …
 
1.      Do you have any information for the following?
 
* Details: 
* Running software: 
* Source code: 
* General documentation: 
 
Thanks in advance for your help. 
 
Of course, you are welcome to modify my current draft to come up with an 
enhanced version:
 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary#Harnessing_ITS_2.0_Metadata_to_Improve_the_Human_Review_Process

 
Cheers,
Christian
 
From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 2:34 AM
To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Subject: [All] high level use cases not yet ready to publish, please have 
another look
 
Hi all, esp. Christian,

I had a brief look at 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary


and I think this is not yet ready even for a first public working draft.

I won't point to specific sections here, but please have another look at 
"your" section with the following in mind:

- Don't mention something that is not in the spec anymore, e.g. 
"Disambiguation". Call this "Text Analysis Annotation".
- The "More Information and Implementation Status/Issues" sections are 
extremely heterogenous. Please, re-write them following this simple 
pattern taken from ENLASO:


[ 
Tool: Okapi Framework (ENLASO). 
Detailed slides at http://tinyurl.com/8tmg49d 
Running software: http://code.google.com/p/okapi/downloads/list 
Source code: http://code.google.com/p/okapi/source/browse/ 
General documentation: http://www.opentag.com/okapi/wiki/ 
]

- Don't just "list" data categories. Describe their benefit in your 
implementation.
- Use a simple & sweet language style like e.g. in
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary#Simple_Machine_Translation




The document should be a *high level* overview. Currently it has 20 pages 
- that's too long. We can provide details & more text in other 
publications.

NOTE for the EC project folks: this document is an important part for us 
to raise awareness for Rome and to give input for the Luxembourg review. 
Please invest the time to take above considerations into account.

Please, do that by Tuesday EOB 19 February. 

Christian, what are your thoughts on editing this and making this ready 
for publication, also in terms fo timing.

Best,

Felix
 
 
 


************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail.

www.vistatec.com
************************************************************