- From: Pedro L. Díez Orzas <pedro.diez@linguaserve.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:15:15 +0100
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Yves Savourel'" <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, "'dave lewis'" <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "'Clemens Weins'" <Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com>, "'Phil Ritchie'" <philr@vistatec.ie>, "'Ankit Srivastava'" <asrivastava@computing.dcu.ie>, "'Arle Lommel'" <Arle.Lommel@dfki.de>
Thank you Felix, Also it can be simplified technical demos/business scenario, so each demo is organized by the participants internally. It makes it shorter and faster: Showcase: Technical demo (one or more participant) Business usage scenario I confirm I can Friday 1st March 13.00 UTC. Best, Pedro -----Mensaje original----- De: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] Enviado el: miércoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 10:10 Para: "Pedro L. Díez Orzas" CC: 'Yves Savourel'; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; 'dave lewis'; 'Clemens Weins'; 'Phil Ritchie'; 'Ankit Srivastava'; 'Arle Lommel' Asunto: Re: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 1-3 p.m. UTC (Friday this week) Hi Pedro, what you say makes a lot of sense. I will revisit the agenda now and we can discuss it today at the call. All, if you cannot participate: does Friday this week work for you? I didn't see anybody protesting, but I'm not sure if this is because everybody prefers 1 March over 8 March for the prep call, or if people didn't see the mail ;) Best, Felix Am 26.02.13 21:09, schrieb Pedro L. Díez Orzas: > Hi Felix, Yves, all, > > Just two things: > > 1) The Selected usage scenarios "Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4)" is only about WP4, not wp3. I will use a base the presentation in Rome and adapt to Lux (in Roma is the client who present it). > > 2) About merging agenda, I think Yves is right. We could organize each case from two different points of view, technical and business. For example, for two demos of WP3 and WP4: > > TMS-CMS (WP3): > Technical demo 1: Cocomore > Technical demo 2: Linguaserve > Business usage scenario: Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization for the > Multilingual Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities > > Online Translation System (WP4): > Technical demo 1: Linguaserve > Technical demo 2: DCU > Technical demo 3: Lucy > Business usage scenario: Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in > HTML5 with the SpanishTax Agency > > ... etc > > Just my two cents. > Pedro > > ____________________________________ > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] Enviado el: martes, 26 de > febrero de 2013 18:08 > Para: Yves Savourel > CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; 'dave lewis'; 'Clemens Weins'; "''Pedro L. Díez Orzas''"; 'Phil Ritchie'; 'Ankit Srivastava'; 'Arle Lommel' > Asunto: Re: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 1-3 > p.m. UTC (Friday this week) > > Am 26.02.13 18:03, schrieb Yves Savourel: >>> These two >>> [ >>> • Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the >>> SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4) • Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization >>> for the Multilingual >>> Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities (WP3)] >>> >>> Are focusing on "business value". I thought that your presentation >>> and Phil might do the same ... but I'm not sure if that would work for you? >>> Thoughts from you, Phil or others? >> Thanks for the pointer Felix. >> >> I guess I'm trying to get a sense of the difference between the demos in the morning and those talks in the afternoon. In both cases they seem to be strictly based on the use cases. >> >> So those afternoon presentations would be more an outline of the business aspects of the use cases? Aren't we risking to repeat ourselves a bit between the morning and afternoon session? >> >> Would it make sense to have longer session for each, that would include the business part and then the demo part as an illustration, and have a few the morning and a few the afternoon? That is instead of having case A demo, case B demo, etc. on the morning and then case A business, case B business in the afternoon, to have: case A business + demo in the morning and case B business + demo in the afternoon. >> >> (I'm just thinking aloud... not that we should change anything). > This is a good thought, Yves. I hadn't the repition aspect in mind. > Let's see what others think - if there is no disagreement I'd then merge the agenda in just "usage scenario" presentations. > > Best, > > Felix >> -yves >> >
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 10:15:44 UTC