Re: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 1-3 p.m. UTC (Friday this week)

Hi Pedro, what you say makes a lot of sense. I will revisit the agenda 
now and we can discuss it today at the call. All, if you cannot 
participate: does Friday this week work for you? I didn't see anybody 
protesting, but I'm not sure if this is because everybody prefers 1 
March over 8 March for the prep call, or if people didn't see the mail ;)

Best,

Felix

Am 26.02.13 21:09, schrieb Pedro L. Díez Orzas:
> Hi Felix, Yves, all,
>
> Just two things:
>
> 1) The Selected usage scenarios "Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4)" is only about WP4, not wp3. I will use a base the presentation in Rome and adapt to Lux (in Roma is the client who present it).
>
> 2) About merging agenda, I think Yves is right. We could organize each case from two different points of view, technical and business. For example, for two demos of WP3 and WP4:
>
> TMS-CMS (WP3):
>  Technical demo 1: Cocomore
>  Technical demo 2: Linguaserve
>  Business usage scenario: Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization for the Multilingual Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities
>
> Online Translation System (WP4):
>  Technical demo 1: Linguaserve
>  Technical demo 2: DCU
>  Technical demo 3: Lucy
>  Business usage scenario: Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the SpanishTax Agency
>
> ... etc
>
> Just my two cents.
> Pedro
>
>   ____________________________________
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Enviado el: martes, 26 de febrero de 2013 18:08
> Para: Yves Savourel
> CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; 'dave lewis'; 'Clemens Weins'; "''Pedro L. Díez Orzas''"; 'Phil Ritchie'; 'Ankit Srivastava'; 'Arle Lommel'
> Asunto: Re: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 1-3 p.m. UTC (Friday this week)
>
> Am 26.02.13 18:03, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>>> These two
>>> [
>>> •  Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the
>>> SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4) •  Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization for
>>> the Multilingual
>>> Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities (WP3)]
>>>
>>> Are focusing on "business value". I thought that your presentation
>>> and Phil might do the same ... but I'm not sure if that would work for you?
>>> Thoughts from you, Phil or others?
>> Thanks for the pointer Felix.
>>
>> I guess I'm trying to get a sense of the difference between the demos in the morning and those talks in the afternoon. In both cases they seem to be strictly based on the use cases.
>>
>> So those afternoon presentations would be more an outline of the business aspects of the use cases? Aren't we risking to repeat ourselves a bit between the morning and afternoon session?
>>
>> Would it make sense to have longer session for each, that would include the business part and then the demo part as an illustration, and have a few the morning and a few the afternoon? That is instead of having case A demo, case B demo, etc. on the morning and then case A business, case B business in the afternoon, to have: case A business + demo in the morning and case B business + demo in the afternoon.
>>
>> (I'm just thinking aloud... not that we should change anything).
> This is a good thought, Yves. I hadn't the repition aspect in mind.
> Let's see what others think - if there is no disagreement I'd then merge the agenda in just "usage scenario" presentations.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>> -yves
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 09:10:00 UTC