- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:07:31 +0100
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org, 'dave lewis' <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, 'Clemens Weins' <Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com>, "''Pedro L. Díez Orzas''" <pedro.diez@linguaserve.com>, 'Phil Ritchie' <philr@vistatec.ie>, 'Ankit Srivastava' <asrivastava@computing.dcu.ie>, 'Arle Lommel' <Arle.Lommel@dfki.de>
Am 26.02.13 18:03, schrieb Yves Savourel: >> These two >> [ >> • Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the >> SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4) >> • Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization for the Multilingual >> Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities (WP3)] >> >> Are focusing on "business value". I thought that your presentation and >> Phil might do the same ... but I'm not sure if that would work for you? >> Thoughts from you, Phil or others? > Thanks for the pointer Felix. > > I guess I'm trying to get a sense of the difference between the demos in the morning and those talks in the afternoon. In both cases they seem to be strictly based on the use cases. > > So those afternoon presentations would be more an outline of the business aspects of the use cases? Aren't we risking to repeat ourselves a bit between the morning and afternoon session? > > Would it make sense to have longer session for each, that would include the business part and then the demo part as an illustration, and have a few the morning and a few the afternoon? That is instead of having case A demo, case B demo, etc. on the morning and then case A business, case B business in the afternoon, to have: case A business + demo in the morning and case B business + demo in the afternoon. > > (I'm just thinking aloud... not that we should change anything). This is a good thought, Yves. I hadn't the repition aspect in mind. Let's see what others think - if there is no disagreement I'd then merge the agenda in just "usage scenario" presentations. Best, Felix > -yves >
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 17:07:59 UTC