RE: Issue-55: XLIFF mapping - Terminology and termInfoPointer

Hi Felix,

> just to understand: is this a question that might lead 
> to a change in ITS2 or only in the mapping approach?

No, just the mapping I think.
Except if there is a need to have some local attribute its:termInfo in ITS, but apparently there was none so far since ITS 1.0.

As for the mapping: it makes things a bit more complicated, but doable (I think).

Mārcis, Dave, David: I've updated the XLIFF output of the test files for Terminology with a tentative mapping:
Any thoughts?


Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 00:32:25 UTC