- From: Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:50:45 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
My only concern with it is that ITS 2.0 is actually much more complex than Dublin Core. But that is really a quibble. In terms of a way to indicate to the public what ITS 2.0 is intended to do, I think it is a good metaphor for those who know Dublin Core. If you really wanted to get an expert opinion on the metaphor, you could ask Sue-Ellen Wright, but I think for your purpose the formulation is good. I may borrow it in some form like "just as Dublin Core has revolutionized the field of resource description and discovery, ITS 2.0 has the potential to have far-reaching aspects on preparing data and making it accessible for various usages across language boundaries.” -Arle On 2013 Feb 18, at 21:41 , Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > would you agree with the statement made in the subject of this mail? > > I'm asking since like Dublin Core metadata > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Core > ITS 2.0 > > - provides a relatively small set of metadata items > - separates between concepts and various syntaxes (HTML(5), XML) to write these > - metadata covers a broad range of applications > > I'm asking for two reasons: > - with the "high level summary" we want to publish at http://www.w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl > would above phrase be something for the introduction? > - with the reporting for our underlying EU project in mind - would above phrase help to make the role of ITS 2.0 clear? > > Thanks for any feedback in advance, > > Felix >
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 21:51:18 UTC