- From: Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0200
- To: "'Jirka Kosek'" <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Fully agree, W3C's is definetely more readable, I will go with that then.
Thanks,
Pablo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@kosek.cz]
Enviado el: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 11:38
Para: Pablo Nieto Caride
CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Asunto: Re: [Action-484] Create an ABNF based on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Apr/0047.html
On 16.4.2013 11:30, Pablo Nieto Caride wrote:
> I assume both are valid, in that case do we have any preference?
These are just variations. Personally I prefer W3C style, it's more readable to normal reader IMHO.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 09:45:30 UTC