Re: action-458 and action-460 (NIF changes)

Hi Felix,

Attached are some suggestions for improving the NIF section.

All the best -- Jörg

On Apr 06, 2013 at 13:02 (CEST), Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I made changes to the NIF sections
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#conversion-to-nif
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#nif-backconversion
>
>
> - conversion to NIF now uses http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5147 fragment
> identifiers
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/458
>
> - NIF examples use stable NIF URI
> http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/460
>
> - updated the predicates that are ITS specific so that they align with
> Jirka's / my comments at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Mar/0070.html
>
> that is, no XSD or any other datatype dependency for the range of RDF
> triples using the predicates.
>
> Please have a look. Dave, with this input document
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-HTML-whitespace-normalization
>
> does this NIF ouput
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/nif/EX-nif-conversion-output.xml
>
> has the right ITS ontology predicates for you? In the example I used
> three data categories: Translate, Elements Within Text, Text Analysis.
>
> I closed above action items, but to make sure the NIF entry in the
> references section is available and as a last health check before
> leaving last call, I created
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/481
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>