W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > April 2013

RE: [All] next publication of ITS2 draft

From: Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:16:06 +0200
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
Cc: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <046501ce304b$df619d80$9e24d880$@linguaserve.com>
Ok perfect, I'll try to close both before next publication, talk to you


Hi Pablo,

Am 03.04.13 10:42, schrieb Pablo Nieto Caride:
> Hi Felix, all,
> I'm already working on it, but I'm not an implemeter of the data 
> category so I wasn't very familiar with the issue so I'm still doing 
> some research. I need to clarify some doubts:
> Based on the issue raised by Yves last December, two actions were created:
> 1) Action-385 to create a common sub-set of regex supported by most of 
> the engines, to substitute the recommendation of using the XML Schema 
> Character Class regular expression syntax, because it's less 
> interoperable (I agree with Yves). This sub-set would be still 
> compatible and useable with implementations using a XML Schema regular 
> expression engine, and no changes on the test files would be needed 
> since the regular expressions used on the files are simple and would be
covered by the sub-set.
> 2) Action-430 to write a BP note explaining the importance of using 
> Unicode normalization (I think this is important)
> The situation right now is that:
> For 1) Shaun created a sub-set that Felix corrected:
> ^(\.|\[\^?-?(([&#x09;&#x0A;&#x0D;&#x20;-&#x2C;&#x2E;-&#x5B;&#x5F;-&#xD
> 7FF;&# 
> xE000;-&#xFFFD;&#x10000;-&#x10FFFF;]|\\n|\\r|\\t|\\]|\\^|\\-|\\\\)(-([
> &#x09;
> &#x0A;&#x0D;&#x20;-&#x2C;&#x2E;-&#x5B;&#x5F;-&#xD7FF;&#xE000;-&#xFFFD;
> &#x100 00;-&#x10FFFF;]|\\n|\\r|\\t|\\]|\\^|\\-|\\\\))?)+-?\])?$
> but it's returning the error: missing "]"
> For 2) Shaun didn't write anything.
> Am I correct?

Yes, that's correct. I think the action-430 is not that critical, but having
action-385 closed before the next publication would be great.

> Anyway I'll do my best to have it finished by Friday or Monday the 
> latest, we can talk about this on today's call.

Great, thanks.



> Cheers,
> Pablo.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Hi all,
> we should publish a new draft under w3.org/TR/ soon. The last 
> publication is about 5 months ago. We are two months late, see 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/process.html#three-month-ru
> le
> "It is important that a Working Group keep the Membership and public 
> informed of its activity and progress. To this end, each Working Group 
> SHOULD publish in the W3C technical reports index a new draft of each 
> active technical report at least once every three months. An active 
> technical report is a Working Draft, Candidate Recommendation, 
> Proposed Recommendation, or Proposed Edited Recommendation. Each 
> Working Group MUST publish a new draft of at least one of its active 
> technical reports on the W3C technical reports index [PUB11] at least once
every three months."
> I would not publish this week, but rather try to get two things done
> - close "allowed characters". Pablo, could you do
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/385
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/430
> this week?
> - work on NIF
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/458
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/460
> I would do that this week
> potentially more (e.g. with regards to the relation to HTML), if we 
> have time + consensus.
> We then could publish next week. Let's discuss this during tomorrow's
> Best,
> Felix
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 09:17:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:07 UTC