- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:57:26 +0200
- To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czqEn-O9iZVLRa1GKqhtcEobngoT+vaqovzwecXBH_LNvg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, as an input to issue-51, to the "global rules" part. I went through the new data categories. Below are some proposals. In the cases there the "main function of global rules, to define stable information about a document format" (adapted from Yves' mail), I propose to drop global rules. - Domain, LocaleFilter, external resource, target pointer, preserve space, allowed characters, storage size, id value: keep global rules as is. - QualityIssue, Quality Precis, Disambiguation, mtConfidence, text analysis annotation, provenance: drop global rules. It seems that rules here don't fulfill the main function mentioned above. That is also related to the aspect of adding a closed set of metadata values, like "yes" or "no" for translate. That makes sense for a document format, e.g. "all code elements are translatable". But it doesn't make sense for the six data categories: they don't add a closed set but rather open sets of values, e.g. mtConfidence score =0.5. These will probably not be specific to a document format. Thoughts? Felix -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 11:57:53 UTC