- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:52:17 +0100
- To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Thanks, Jörg and Yves. I uploaded a new version of the edits, including Yves' suggestions, to http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/File:Its20-annotation-edits.docx I will not put this into the draf yet put will put it onto the agenda for tomorrow. We then hopefully can go to "last call" saying: including the edits at http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/File:Its20-annotation-edits.docx Best, Felix Am 02.12.12 16:48, schrieb Jörg Schütz: > Hi folks, > With these ammendments, now everything sounds pretty much correct and > reasonable. > Cheers -- Jörg > > On Dec 02, 2012 at 16:15 (UTC+1), Yves Savourel wrote: >> Hi Felix, Phil, Dave, all, >> >>> 1) sometimes you want to provide tool information just >>> about the textual data >>> 2) sometimes you want to provide tool information >>> about the textual data + annotations >>> 3) sometimes you want to provide tool information >>> about just annotations >> >> So this is case 1): >> >> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp' >> its:provToolRef='myMTiri' >> >text</span> >> >> >> This is case 1) and case 2) at the same time: >> (with the fudging that myMTuri is not really doing the annotation, >> but provides the information being carried by the annotation (the >> confidence score)) >> >> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp' >> its:provToolRef='myMTiri' >> its:mtConfidence='0.8' >> its:annotatorsRef='mt-confidence|myMTiri'>text</span> >> >> >> I assume this is case 2) and case 3), but case 1) is not done here: >> >> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp' >> its:mtConfidence='0.8' >> its:annotatorsRef='provenance|SomeToolIri >> mt-confidence|myMTiri'>text</span> >> >> >> I assume this is case 1), 2) and 3) at the same time: >> >> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp' >> its:provToolRef='myMTiri' >> its:mtConfidence='0.8' >> its:annotatorsRef='provenance|SomeToolIri >> mt-confidence|myMTiri'>text</span> >> >> The fact that in these two last cases the two IRIs of annotatorsRef >> points to different things (one is the tool that added the markup, >> the other is the tool that provided the info to carry in the markup) >> is still bothering me a bit. But I suppose if it's explained in the >> ITS Tool Annotation section (and the Provenance section) it's OK. >> >> The added text seems ok. >> >> Typos/notes: >> >> -- "...only meant to be used then actual ITS annotation is involved" >> should be "...only meant to be used ***when*** actual ITS annotation >> is involved" >> >> -- "Example 27: Example of ITS Tool Annotation" maybe: "Example 27: >> Example of ITS Tools Annotation"? >> >> cheers, >> -yves >> >
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 15:52:42 UTC