Re: [ACTION-208] Add voting support to Locationzation Quality Précis

If we move to decimals between 0 and 1 (inclusive) I think we need to review any other numerics outside the quality categories to make sure that we follow the same convention so that there is a consistent ITS 2.0 approach. I don't know right off where else we have comparable numerics, but it is something to remember.

-Arle


On Aug 31, 2012, at 10:03 AM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Yves, all,
> 
> 2012/8/30 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
> Hi all,
> 
> I've added the attributes locQualityPrecisVote and locQualityPrecisVotePointer to the data category.
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#lqprecis
> 
> 
> - The name is not great maybe we should have locQualityPrecisVotingScore and locQualityPrecisRangeScore but this is getting just too long and probably confusing.
> 
> - I've adapted an example to show the voting, but a better one are certainly welcome.
> 
> - Currently we can use either vote or score not both. This allows to share the threshold. Hopefully this is fine. Otherwise we may have to also have a threshold for the voting.
> 
> - We've talked about harmonizing the scores/ranges in general. Currently locQualityPrecisScore is an integer between 0 and 100 (inclusive). Should we move to a decimal between 0 and 1?
> 
> Good idea, that fits to yesterday's conclusion
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2012/08/30-mlw-lt-irc.html#T15-03-05
> 
> Best,
> 
> Felix
>  
> 
> Cheers,
> -yves
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>