Re: [ACTION-208] Add voting support to Locationzation Quality Précis

My requirement for scores is that I need potentially hundreds of discrete 
values. For sake of interoperability I'm happy to map to a range but I 
don't want to end up "loosing precision" amongst my values as a 
consequence: i.e. 0-2000 of my scores map to 0-1 ITS and thus give values 
such as 0.897, 0.898, etc.

My request would be to standardise on 0-100 decimal.

Phil.





From:   Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
To:     <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, 
Date:   30/08/2012 21:59
Subject:        [ACTION-208] Add voting support to Locationzation Quality 
Précis



Hi all,

I've added the attributes locQualityPrecisVote and 
locQualityPrecisVotePointer to the data category.
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#lqprecis



- The name is not great maybe we should have locQualityPrecisVotingScore 
and locQualityPrecisRangeScore but this is getting just too long and 
probably confusing.

- I've adapted an example to show the voting, but a better one are 
certainly welcome.

- Currently we can use either vote or score not both. This allows to share 
the threshold. Hopefully this is fine. Otherwise we may have to also have 
a threshold for the voting.

- We've talked about harmonizing the scores/ranges in general. Currently 
locQualityPrecisScore is an integer between 0 and 100 (inclusive). Should 
we move to a decimal between 0 and 1?

Cheers,
-yves





************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail.

www.vistatec.com
************************************************************