RE: MLW-LT minutes 2012-08-23 ...

Thanks for the confirmation Arle.

-yves

 

 

From: Arle Lommel [mailto:arle.lommel@dfki.de] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 3:52 AM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Subject: Re: MLW-LT minutes 2012-08-23 ...

 

Hi Yves,

 

Précis is a somewhat unusual word on American English that is used primarily in academic circles. I have never seen is spelled as precise, so that is definitely out. I have seen it on occasion spelled as precis, but I think that was only by people who didn't know how to type the acute accent.

 

So use précis. For an attribute name I think dropping the accent is not a problem, but definitely don't add the e to the end as that is, as you note, a totally different word.

 

-Arle

On Aug 23, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:





I guess Mr. Webster says it's "Précis" in US spelling too.
(http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pr%C3%A9cis)

So I'll go with that rather than "Precise" expect if someone tells me otherwise by tomorrow European EOD.

-ys

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 10:12 AM
To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Subject: RE: MLW-LT minutes 2012-08-23 ...

Hi everyone,

Sorry I couldn't make the call.




<joerg> What about naming conventions: Localization Quality Precis 
(mixed en-US + fr-FR) vs. Localization Quality Precise (en-US)?


Actually it was Phil who proposed "Précis" so I assume it's somewhat English too. I suppose we should use the US spelling indeed. But so far the US Webster tells me "Precise" is an adjective, not a noun.

So what should I use? I'll ask in my office, but if anyone is an authority on US spelling I'm listing.
It would be nice to know quite soon: we IDs to not change if possible.

Thanks,
-yves